agentic checks passed 46% readiness - how well this site can be read, trusted and transacted with by AI agents
Last checked
wm.edu is live and passes 9 of 30 agentic-readiness checks (46%). It runs on Apache over HTTPS.
For AI agents, wm.edu's strongest signals are clean semantic HTML, tidy, crawlable markup, fully indexable pages, and a clear canonical URL. Average 42% atomic sentences across 1 pages (target 40%+).
Its main gaps are text that is hard for agents to extract, no structured tables or lists, few clear definitions, and no self-contained answer passages. The weakest area is Trust & transparency; addressing it first would raise this score the most.
Agent interaction
✓Semantic HTML5 & AccessibilityARIA attributes found for accessibility
✓Clean, Crawlable HTMLPage has title and meta description
✗Extraction Friction ScoreAverage sentence length: 35.7 words - too long for AI snippets
✓Indexability & Snippet EligibilityPages are indexable and snippet-eligible - the precondition for Google AI features is met
~Layout Stability & Responsiveness44/45 images lack explicit width/height - the most common cause of layout shift (CLS)
✓Canonical URL StrategySingle canonical tag present (no duplicates)
~Page Speed: Page SizeApproximately 1116 DOM nodes
~Page Speed: Load Blockers3 render-blocking script(s) in <head>
Machine extraction
✗Table & List ExtractabilityNo HTML tables found across homepage
✓Sentence AtomicityAverage 42% atomic sentences across 1 pages (target 40%+)
✓Entity DensityAverage entity density 59.9% across 1 pages (target >15%)
✗Definition PatternsNo definition patterns found
✗Answer Capsule Pattern1/13 H2 sections have 15-30 word self-contained capsules (8%)
Structured data
✓Schema.org Structured DataOrganization or LocalBusiness schema found on homepage
✗Schema Coverage & DepthArticle schema missing or has fewer than 2 key properties
✗Speakable SchemaNo SpeakableSpecification schema found across homepage
AI discovery
✗llms.txt FileNo llms.txt file found at https://wm.edu/llms.txt (connection failed)
~robots.txt for AI CrawlersNo explicit AI crawler rules in robots.txt
✓Sitemap Completeness1 URLs have lastmod dates
✗RSS/Atom FeedHomepage does not link to an RSS/Atom feed in <head>
✗Internationalization SignalsNo hreflang alternate links found
✗Content Licensing & AI PermissionsNo ai.txt file found
Trust & transparency
~Entity Authority & E-E-A-TNo phone number found on homepage
~Creator TransparencyVisible authorship is present on some content but inconsistent
~Methodology TransparencyLittle content-production or review transparency is visible
~AI Assistance DisclosureNo AI-assistance disclosure found on sampled pages (neutral - the engine cannot tell whether AI was used)
✗Visible Date SignalNo visible date signals found across homepage (no <time> elements, no JSON-LD dates, no article meta dates)
✓Title & Meta QualityTitles are present, unique, and well-sized, and pages carry meta descriptions
✗Content Freshness SignalsNo JSON-LD date properties (datePublished/dateModified) found across homepage
✗Author & Expert SchemaNo Person schema found across homepage
Every check is a verifiable fact about wm.edu's live pages. Scoring follows Google Lighthouse agentic-browsing: a fraction of concrete checks, not an invented 0-100.
How to improve for AI agents
The highest-impact changes to make wm.edu more agent-ready, in priority order.
1 Add structured tables and lists critical impactmedium effort
Present wm.edu's comparison and spec data as real HTML tables and lists agents can extract.
